Community Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113660564
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Marshall, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8286491200
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,808,944
- Expenses
- $2,812,426
- Assets
- $4,850,393
- Liabilities
- $748,734
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christopher Watson (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Christopher Watson (Executive Director): $58,676 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and facilitate healthy, safe, and affordable housing through advocacy, education, and resource development.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Healthy Opportunities Pilot (HOP) facilitates home repairs through Managed Medicaid clients to those that otherwise may not have qualified for assistance. - Served 59 homes with $634,000.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.4%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.4% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $59K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $778K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.