Community Housing Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931543498
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8017833430
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,015
- Expenses
- $59,407
- Assets
- $719
- Liabilities
- $111
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- RYAN BAUGHMAN (DIRECTOR)
- BRYAN SWISS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote and advance the general welfare and camaraderie of the multi-family housing industry through education; to advocate and encourage constant improvement of techniques in ownership and management within the apartment industry; to cooperate with other trade associations in all matters relating to the advancement of the entire housing industry; and to advocate a code of ethics in order to maintain high professional standards and sound business methods among its members for the best interest of the industry and the public pertaining to its members (individuals, firms, organizations, or corporations) located in dekalb, fulton, clayton, or fayette county, Georgia, or such other Georgia counties as the board shall approve from time to time.
What it reported doing in 2023
Promote and advance the general welfare and camaraderie of the multi-family housing industry through education; to advocate and encourage constant improvement of techniques in ownership and management within the apartment industry; to cooperate with other trade associations in all matters relating to the advancement of the entire housing industry; and to advocate a code of ethics in order to maintain high professional standards and sound business methods among its members for the best interest of the industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.