Community Hospitals of Central California Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770191730
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fresno, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5594596000
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,054,796
- Expenses
- $25,761,349
- Assets
- $47,822,829
- Liabilities
- $27,773,338
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CRAIG WAGONER (PRESIDENT & CEO (AS OF 02/25))
Highest reported compensation
- CRAIG S CASTRO - PRES CEO ((THRU 02/25)/CONSULTANT(AS OF 02/25)): $3,115,707 total reported compensation
- CRAIG WAGONER (PRESIDENT & CEO (AS OF 02/25)): $1,767,621 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER NEUMAN (SVP, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $1,353,941 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community hospitals of central California foundation (chccf), also known as the office of philanthropy, is the fundraising arm for community health system (chs), whose mission is to better the lives of all those we serve. Chccf supports this mission by providing grants and donor-contributed funds back to chs for capital needs, programs, and services.
What it reported doing in 2024
By securing charitable contributions from individuals, corporations, and foundations, chccf provided $21,059,616 to fresno community hospital and medical center to support capital - equipment, technology, and facility upgrades - as well as training and education for healthcare workers and funded $1,788,324 of its patient care operating expenditures.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.8%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.8% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.