Community Hospital of San Bernardino FOUNDATION
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953051931
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9088876333
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $708,865
- Expenses
- $1,128,576
- Assets
- $8,667,485
- Liabilities
- $68,938
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- June Collison (Director): $787,877 total reported compensation
- Darryl VandenBosch (Former Officer): $600,249 total reported compensation
- Dave Evans (CFO/ Assistant Treasurer): $339,506 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The community hospital foundation's mission as adopted by the board is the mission of the supported organization, community hospital of san bernardino, which is a non-profit, full-service, acute care facility in business to provide acute inpatient care, long-term care and a wide range of ancillary and therapeutic care to the community we serve. Our vision is to create and provide health care solutions, and meet the health care needs of our community. The foundation fulfills this joint mission by providing philanthropic support for the programs of community hospital of san bernardino (hospital). Fundraising support allows the hospital to carry out its mission, to deliver compassionate, high quality, affordable health services, provide direct services to the poor, and advocate on their behalf and create partnerships that improve community health.
What it reported doing in 2016
The foundation is an irc sec 509(a)(3) supporting organization to community hospital of san bernardino ("hospital"). As a supporting organization, the foundation operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the hospital which include making payments directly to the hospital.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -59.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.68; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $911K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $788K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.