Community Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 420738969
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hamburg, IA, USA
- Phone
- 7123821515
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,085,474
- Expenses
- $17,563,787
- Assets
- $8,754,453
- Liabilities
- $1,846,007
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR THOMAS LARGEN (PRESIDENT)
- TROY HENDRICKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CRISTIN HENDRICKSON (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL OURADA (PROVIDER): $251,963 total reported compensation
- CRISTIN HENDRICKSON (CEO): $198,205 total reported compensation
- JAYLENE ZANKER (PROVIDER): $191,588 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
George c. Grape community hospital's well trained medical staff and health care team will strive to exceed patients' expectations by providing continuity of personalized care through easy access to services.
What it reported doing in 2024
George c. Grape community hospital is a 25 bed critical access hospital that received initial certification on august 1, 2001. The hospital is owned and operated by community hospital inc., doing business as george c. Grape community hospital.as a critical access hospital, george c. Grape community hospital performs an annual program evaluation in order to determine whether the service is appropriate, adequate, effective and efficient. This evaluation also determines whether the utilization of services was appropriate, established policies were followed, determines any changes needed and recommends projects for development during the next year. Statistical analysis: 1.) acute care- there were a total of 82 inpatient admissions during fiscal year 2025 compared to 88 admissions during fiscal year 2024.2.) swing bed- 38 swing bed admissions were recorded during fiscal year 2025 compared to 43 admissions during fiscal year 2024. 3.) surgical cases- there were a total of 125 surgical cases for the 2025 fiscal year as compared to 148 surgical cases during fiscal year 2024.4.) outpatient services- emergency room services increased from 847 visits in fiscal year 2024 to 978 visits in fiscal year 2025. Laboratory services decreased from 14,149 in fiscal year 2024 to 13,148 in fiscal year 2025. Radiology services decreased from 2,218 in fiscal year 2024 to 2,124 in fiscal year 2025. Ultrasound services decreased from 479 in fiscal year 2024 to 359 in fiscal year 2025. Nuclear medicine services increased from 39 in fiscal year 2024 to 40 in fiscal year 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 81.8%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 81.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $252K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.