Community Healthcare Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133083068
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2125452404
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,043,225
Expenses
$102,888,321
Assets
$179,256,379
Liabilities
$101,780,433

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT MICHAEL HAYES (CEO/PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT MICHAEL HAYES (CEO/PRESIDENT): $518,215 total reported compensation
  • ALAN J WENGROFSKY (EVP/CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER): $443,837 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL LOUIS NAPOLITANO (CHIEF POPULATION HEALTH AND CARE MGT. OFFICER): $430,553 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Chn provides a broad range of health services including but not limited to primary and preventative care, and mental health services to a largely medically underserved population.

What it reported doing in 2025

Chn provides a broad range of health services including but not limited to primary and preventative care, and mental health services to a largely medically underserved population. Chn provided health care services for 156,720 health care visits for the calendar year ended december 31, 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $31,042.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.6% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $518K · 26 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.1M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.