Community Health Provider Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464915176
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
7209255280
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,539,291
Expenses
$9,783,704
Assets
$11,935,860
Liabilities
$1,034,109

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANIA ARNOLDI (PRESIDENT)
  • JASON GREER STARTED 6624 (CONTRACT CEO)
  • BEN WIEDERHOLT (INTERIM CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHELE APODACA RN (CLINICAL OPE): $214,373 total reported compensation
  • MARK SANDVIK (CFO): $202,595 total reported compensation
  • BEN WIEDERHOLT (INTERIM CEO): $145,750 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to provide cost-effective, high-quality integrated primary care and preventative services to Colorado's low-income working families and individuals. Our members formed chpa to achieve the triple aim and improve care transitions and best practices in our patient-centered medical home care model; and to develop alternative payment methodologies and payment reform which decrease overall healthcare costs and increase patient satisfaction. We believe that through these endeavors, our patients will have access to a high-quality integrated comprehensive primary care delivery system.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program accomplishments include completion of performance year 5 (2024) of the contract period of the medicare shared savings program for 2020-2024. Shared savings for performance year 4 (2023) under track e of the mssp program totaled 17,288,693 of which 8,471,459 was received. Participating members received 4,052,719 in performance payments with an additional our mssp participating members. An additional 20% was allocated by the board of directors to fund member specific improvement efforts, 21% in for aco network improvement efforts along with 6% for the member development program and 5% to support chpa's operating costs. Chpa maintained and added to its portfolio of value-based aco contracts with medicare advantage and commercial insurance partners; development of population health strategies; continued business development of the aco.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.6%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 44.7%; rating input score 45; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 32.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.6% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $214K · 17 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $198K reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.