Community Health Network Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510181688
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3173555261
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,411,462
- Expenses
- $17,379,916
- Assets
- $112,126,232
- Liabilities
- $12,117,031
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOYCE IRWIN (NON-VOTING DIR/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BRYAN A MILLS (NON-VOTING DIRECTOR): $3,879,760 total reported compensation
- PATRICK MCGILL MD (DIRECTOR): $1,618,140 total reported compensation
- ROBIN LEDYARD MD (DIRECTOR): $1,106,162 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the community health network foundation, inc. ("chf") is to support the caregivers of community health network ("chnw"), who are dedicated to enhancing the health of the communities we serve. Chf supports the health network's mission by securing funds from donors, funders, and grants, allocating these resources in support of programs and services of chnw.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community health network foundation, inc. ("chf") provides millions annually in operational and capital philanthropic dollars raised from benevolent donors to help community health network ("chnw") fulfill its mission of building healthier communities. Through its allocation of funds, chf addresses need in challenging areas of healthcare including behavioral care, cardiovascular, oncology, tobacco cessation, women's and children's care, and others. The cutting-edge grail galleri test accurately detects multiple types of cancers not otherwise detectable by existing screens, through a single blood draw. The community connections program closes the gap between clinical and community-based services that affect underserved populations. Patient and caregiver assistance programs provide transportation solutions to deliver patients for care across the network through uber health and our mabel's ride program, housing and family connections programs at community fairbanks recovery center, and health screenings at the black and minority health fair. Chf supports the choice program, leading the state in addressing the opioid crisis among pregnant women and their infants. Youth bereavement programs reach students who have suffered a loss of a family member. In schools, chf supports nursing care for over a million students, and behavioral care for a quarter million children. Additionally, chf funds initiatives in chaplaincy services, reduces heart failure readmission rates through nutritional supports and blood pressure monitoring, and protects newborns with car seats, and through the babe store, incentivizing infant care with free supplies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.9%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85%; rating input score 85; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.45; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.9% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 20 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $12.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.9M · 30 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $256K reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.