Community Health Initiative Haiti- Komonite Sante Inisyativ Dayiti
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452732804
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3193136619
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,765
- Expenses
- $112,363
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Leah Mathiason (Executive Director)
- Kim Riley Adams (Board President)
People named in this filing
- Leah Mathiason (Executive Director)
- Val Kestner (Board Member)
- Robin Meetz (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
CHI's primary purpose is to provide medical care and public health services to communities in rural Haiti. The organization also partners with other organizations to address issues such as water quality and sanitation, nutrition, and community development.
What it reported doing in 2023
CHI organizes medical and surgical clinics in Haiti. Historically these clinics were staffed primarily by volunteer medical and non-medical professionals from the US, however due to unsafe travel conditions and the Covid pandemic all clinics in 2020 and 2021 have been staffed by Haitian medical providers. The clinics provide an opportunity for health education, preventative health care, and diagnosis and treatment of individual patients. CHI's Haitian-led clinics provided crucial health care to approximately 3,000 patients in 2022.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 43.6%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 43.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.