Community Health Choice Texas Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814077507
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2022
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
713.295.2222
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,905,542,999
Expenses
$1,841,168,439
Assets
$788,933,161
Liabilities
$491,967,032

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA WRIGHT (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • LISA WRIGHT (PRESIDENT & CEO): $667,226 total reported compensation
  • JOHN HALEY (CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER): $495,902 total reported compensation
  • LAURIE LEVERMANN (CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER): $426,056 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community Health Choice is a local, nonprofit, managed care organization committed to helping improve the health and well-being of Texas residents. It was launched in 1997 by Harris Health System and offers affordable and no-cost health insurance plans in southeast Texas. Diabetes is a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high. Blood glucose is your main source of energy and comes from the food you eat. **Insulin** , a **hormone** made by the **pancreas** , helps glucose from food get into your cells to be used for energy. Sometimes your body doesn’t make enough—or any—insulin or doesn’t use insulin well. Glucose then stays in your blood and doesn’t reach your cells. Over time, having too much glucose in your blood can cause **health problems**. Although diabetes has no cure, you can take steps to **manage your diabetes** and stay healthy....

What it reported doing in 2022

The operation of a health maintenance organization providing pre-paid medical & dental care to its approximately 403,943 medicaid, 3,470 chip, 2,670 chip perinatal and 249 dsnp members within a primary service area of harris and contiguous counties in the state of Texas. Part of chct's mission is to serve the uninsured population in southeast Texas. Texas has the largest number of residents without medical coverage in the entire country.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.4%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 73.2%; rating input score 73; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 40.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 93.4% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $667K · 28 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $797.9M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 33 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.