Community Health Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263841441
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Roseburg, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5412298953
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,811,049
- Expenses
- $9,475,659
- Assets
- $4,580,724
- Liabilities
- $935,214
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR CHRISTINE SEALS (PRESIDENT 9/)
- BRUCE PIPER (PRESIDENT 5/)
Highest reported compensation
- DR GEORGE MIDDLEKAUFF (PSYCHIATRIST): $144,637 total reported compensation
- DR STEVEN JEFFERS (PSYCHIATRIST): $130,949 total reported compensation
- DR BRYAN YATES (PSYCHIATRIST): $112,273 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Working together as a community in mutually supportive ways to provide mental health services that empower people to create solutions.
What it reported doing in 2014
Mental health programs & services - comprehensive mental health services including adult and youth treatment, crisis intervention and evaluation, on call mental health emergencies, screening, psychotherapy, therapeutic foster care, learning classrooms, residential care, and school-based programs. Services also include early assessment and support alliance (easa), individual placement support (ips) and supported employment, and assertive community treatment (act) programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 55
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.5%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.5% of revenue deployed · 84.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $145K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.