Community Food Bank of Citrus County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800459100
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Homosassa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3526283663
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,403,282
- Expenses
- $1,281,399
- Assets
- $1,710,954
- Liabilities
- $288,480
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE PONTICOS (PRESIDENT)
- BARBARA SPRAGUE (CEO/EXEC DIR)
Highest reported compensation
- BARBARA SPRAGUE (CEO/EXEC DIR): $97,235 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the community food bank is to be the driving force to promote awareness, inspire involvement and end hunger in the communities it serves.
What it reported doing in 2024
Back-to-back hurricanes helene and milton gave way to new relationships, better understanding of needs, and more refined networks in 2024. The community food bank stepped up to handle fema supplies for citrus county and assist in logisitcs and filling unmet needs in both citrus and hernando counties. We continued to align staff to a structure of solid leadership in anticipation of a 2025 territory expansion including developing relationships in hernando county to bring forth the rise empowerment center concept. We continued to explore the systems and solutions necessary to streamline and improve our operations as well as our interpersonal dealings. We successfully increased the donation level of several granters as well as expanded our reach for possible new awards. Four new foundations/grants, 33 monthly donors are aboard (up 12) at 3,893 from 1,475 a month total, and 795,518.33 vs 477,322 (prior year) was logged into our donor crm. We also landed our first government grant with 250,000 in arpa monies for the hernano empowerment center site planning. We had 53 new donor contacts up 30% (goal 10%), 290 total donors, and with 58% retention level (goal is 40-45%). We also increased the gift amounts by 289,481 or 64%. 234 donors were from citrus, 10 from hernando, and 36 were attributed to hernando and citrus combined. 4,610,242 pounds of food and supplies were distributed. 97,826 pounds of scrap was upcycled from local supermarkets to feed animals, leaving just 5,105 as trash instead of 102,931 pounds, just 5% we are looking forward to better serving all clients in need in citrus, hernando, and sumter counties as push expand our territory coverage in 2025 and work to increase food relief as well as promote wrap-around services and support so that no one goes hungry and everyone will rise together.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.