Community Family Centers Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741691632
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7139232316
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,840,361
- Expenses
- $4,039,596
- Assets
- $7,243,368
- Liabilities
- $143,051
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARITZA GUERRERO (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- MARITZA GUERRERO (PRESIDENT &): $130,166 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To equip families with the tools they need to become self-sufficent members of the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
The youth services program implemented by cfc is a prevention education & intervention program that targets three significant concerns impacting todays youth population: substance use/abuse, juvenile delinquency and teen pregnancy. The program focuses on reducing major risk behaviors such as use of alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and active sexual activity through character development and life/social skill learning activities directed to youth, at risk youth & families that promote and foster resiliency skills (ex. Problem solving skills, conflict resolution, decision making & goal setting). Common risk factors typically serve as the triggers leading to substance use/abuse, juvenile delinquent behavior or teen pregnancy/ HIV/stds. The service is provided during the regular academic school year to students ages 5-17 at 18 hisd schools in houstons greater east end. Youth educators are assigned to the various campuses which include elementary, middle and high schools. The educators meet with youth participants on a daily basis and work with the youth for the entire school year. The program follows the evidence-based positive action curriculum that emphasizes building healthy children, strong families and strong communities. Our programs include: - positive action parenting program (research based curriculum, year round program) - countdown to college (nine week program) - camp fresh (10 week summer day camp) - youth program age 13-17 (year round leadership program) - youth program age 6-17 (year round developmental program).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.8%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.8% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.