Community Day School Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910987650
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2067267972
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,278,105
- Expenses
- $8,019,394
- Assets
- $4,106,130
- Liabilities
- $1,170,100
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA NICHOLSON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA NICHOLSON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $139,936 total reported compensation
- SHANNON THOMAS (CHIEF FINANCE & ADMIN (THRU 2/2025)): $131,019 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER PEGARIDO (CHIEF PEOPLE OFFICER): $129,376 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lead the charge to brilliant outcomes for the children of our community by ensuring equitable access to the highest quality learning and care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community day school association, doing business as launch, was founded in 1977 as a Washington nonprofit corporation dedicated to providing high-quality enrichment programming for children ages 3-12. Launch's first site opened at montlake elementary within the seattle public schools (sps) system. The organization expanded to leschi elementary in 1988, hawthorne elementary in 1995, and madrona elementary in 1997, and broadened its scope in 2000 with the opening of its first preschool at leschi elementary.(see additional description continued on schedule o)__in the 2024-2025 school year, launch operated eleven school-age programs (before- and after-school programs and summer learning) at ten sps elementary schools in central, southeast, and west seattle-beacon hill, hawthorne, highland park, kimball, leschi, madrona, maple, montlake, wing luke, and sanislo-as well as a program at its newest location in renton at cascade vista, co-located on the impact public schools black river elementary campus.during 2024-2025, launch operated nine preschool classrooms: one each at beacon hill, highland park, and cascade vista; two at madrona; one at rainier community center; one at delridge community center; and two preschool classrooms plus its first early preschool classroom at the miller community center annex. All seattle-based preschool classrooms participate in the seattle preschool program, a voter-approved city of seattle initiative to make voluntary, high-quality preschool accessible and affordable for all seattle 3- and 4-year-old children. Launch's first out-of-seattle preschool site is located in renton.consistent with its mission to provide equitable access to quality learning and care, launch serves a highly diverse population. For the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025, 59% of enrolled children identified as multiracial or students of color, 38% as white, and 3% as unknown or unanswered. Additionally, 45% of children came from low- to moderate-income households; 25% primarily spoke a non-english language at home; 5% had a disability or an iep; and some families were experiencing homelessness. Launch families spoke 29 languages. Forty-three percent of families reported household incomes below 80% of the area median income, and 27% received childcare subsidies through dshs, the city of seattle, or other providers. Most families rely on launch services while working or enrolled in education programs, and 47% identified as essential workers.launch operates in linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse neighborhoods and strives to hire staff who reflect the communities it serves. In addition to fee-for-service tuition, launch receives funding from foundations, individual donors, and government contracts and subsidies, including the city of seattle families & education levy, dshs, king county, and best start for kids. Launch also provides tuition assistance to families in need.additional information about launch's programs and annual reports is available at www.launchlearning.org
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.