Community Counseling of Bristol County
Legal name: Community Counseling of Bristol County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043035697
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Taunton, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5088235400
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,635,265
- Expenses
- $69,623,403
- Assets
- $52,141,261
- Liabilities
- $12,556,429
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW DAWLEY (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL WEISS (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $726,888 total reported compensation
- ABDELBASSAT ZERGUINE (PSYCHIATRIST): $296,472 total reported compensation
- ANDREW DAWLEY (PRESIDENT/CEO): $277,534 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To develop and deliver compassionate, responsive and quality mental health and addictions treatment services to meet the prevention, education, treatment and rehabilitation needs of those in our community. About the new PACT-Y Program CCBC is hiring for an exciting new program that will provide intensive community-based services to youth, young adults and their families. **PACT-Y (Program for Assertive Community Treatment for Youth)** is an evidence-based, trauma-informed multi-disciplinary team approach that delivers strength based, youth guided and family driven services and skilled therapeutic interventions in the home and community to support youth with serious mental health challenges. This comprehensive, person-centered approach aims to enhance family functioning, provide stabilization, foster growth and resilience, build skills and help prepare youth for the transition to...
What it reported doing in 2024
Child & adolescent services provide a range of community based services for children, adolescents and their families in the greater taunton/attleboro area for youth, from birth to 21 years of age, who are experiencing emotional, behavioral, developmental, or substance abuse difficulties. Through our school based counseling program, we have an extensive outpatient program that includes a school-based component. We are presently providing clinical services to ten public school districts. The clinical based children's counseling program employs 35 full time clinicians as well as 2 child psychiatrists.in home therapy works with families that are in acute crisis. This program provides short-term, therapeutic services to assist the family. In home therapy assists in stabilizing children and adolescents within their home setting during psychiatric crisis or family conflict. The in home therapy team is designed to prevent hospitalization and out of home placement by providing intensive in home clinical and support services during psychiatric crisis and by arranging successful linkage of the family and child with outpatient providers.intensive care coordination is based on a wrap around model that assists families and children to locate, access, coordinate, and monitor mental health, health, social services, educational, and other services. This is a vital step along the pathway to home-based services. Intensive care coordination includes a comprehensive home-based assessment, a single care coordinator, a single treatment team, and a single treatment plan for all services. The cbhc also operated within the child outpatient services department.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $65.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $727K · 15 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.