Community Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352327775
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Walla Walla, WA, USA
Phone
5095406720
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$274,303
Expenses
$300,998
Assets
$349,495
Liabilities
$11,692

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TONY MCGUIRE (PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH ZESSIN (PRESIDENT EL)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY A CAMPBELL (EXECUTIVE DI): $118,041 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission to foster a trusted gathering place where people engage in dialogue, inquiry, and advocacy to build a vibrant region for everyone. Our region includes columbia and walla walla counties and the milton-freewater area.

What it reported doing in 2025

Study & implementation internet for all implementation task force the internet for all implementation task force (itf) was hard at work in 2025, taking on several projects to advance digital inclusion in our region. Community outreach and education in 2025, the itf prioritized the creation of educational materials to help bridge the digital divide. The task force created an informational flier in english and spanish to explain why reliable internet access is vital for education, health care, and economic stability. Additionally, they developed materials in english and spanish listing community programs that offer services such as free wi-fi, public computers, device lending programs, and affordable devices. Media presence and digital resource fair the itfs efforts were publicized through two features in the walla walla union bulletin. The first article highlighted the regions need for affordable, reliable internet and the itfs work, while the second previewed the 2025 digital resource fair. The digital resource fair was a collaborative effort involving 18 community partners, including schools, local governments, nonprofit organizations, and colleges. The digital resource fair created a lively atmosphere, featuring free food from a local vendor and a dj who provided music while serving as the events master of ceremonies. To engage attendees, local organizations, including the lincoln high school esports team, college place high school future business leaders of america, the walla walla ymca, nn developments, and goodwill of the columbia, hosted interactive games. Beyond the fun and games, goodwill also conducted an especially popular class focused on internet safety and security. On the technical side, walla walla university students managed help desks to provide direct support and guide visitors toward valuable online resources. Simultaneously, 21 other entities hosted resource tables to share information about tech-related services and assistance available to community members in our region. To increase accessibility, american sign language and spanish interpretation were provided throughout the event. Excitement peaked when six laptop computers were awarded as door prizes, five of which went to students. While overall attendance was smaller than hoped, the feedback received was overwhelmingly positive. Participants encouraged the itf to host the event again in 2026, offering constructive suggestions to expand outreach efforts. Itf members we would like to recognize and thank our itf members for their hard work and dedication to bridging the digital divide. These 37 volunteers represent a wide array of sectors, including the city of college place, college place public schools, common roots housing trust, goodwill, hope street, port of walla walla, walla walla community college, walla walla county rural library district, walla walla homeless alliance, walla walla public schools, walla walla senior center, worksource walla walla, and various business owners from within and outside the tech industry. Together, we are driving meaningful solutions to close the digital divide and expand broadband internet access for all. We are building a future where everyone in our region can thrive in a connected world.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $266K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.