Community Change Center Weareone
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843568281
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Gary, IN, USA
- Phone
- 7654308952
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitation Services for Offenders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $161,082
- Expenses
- $70,900
- Assets
- $268,113
- Liabilities
- $3,050
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMANTHA BURGETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PRES OF BOARD)
- SEAN MCGINNIS (VICE PRESIDENT OF BOARD)
People named in this filing
- SAMANTHA BURGETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PRES OF BOARD)
- SEAN MCGINNIS (VICE PRESIDENT OF BOARD)
- MICHAEL BRIDGES (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Reentry assist during & post incarcerati
What it reported doing in 2024
Fresh starts food truck - provided support employment to 10 justice involved individuals, where they earn income and receive wrap around support services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.9%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.78; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 46.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $85K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.