Community Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941337611
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Stockton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2094663836
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $391,767
- Expenses
- $632,031
- Assets
- $2,204,526
- Liabilities
- $204,930
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL C NUSS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ELSIE HIRATA (EXEC DIRECTOR): $85,204 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide the means by which people who are visually impaired can improve and sustain their capabilities and potentials to re-establish purpose and self-esteem in their lives and in society, while leading independent lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community center for the blind and visually impaired offers a variety of programs and services that enable individuals who are visually impaired or blind to be as independent as their situations allow and participate fully in society. Services are free through partnerships with California department of rehabilitation blind field services and the older individuals who are blind program, grants from san joaquin community foundation and rotary club of stockton, and the generosity of the community. The programs include: information and referral: connects individuals who are visually impaired with a network of ancillary services and programs-pacific gas and electric company, san joaquin county department of aging, social security administration, state department of rehabilitation, California state library service, veterans administration, and others-that enable them to live independently and productively.adjustment to vision loss: provides useful and practical information that assists with the emotional adjustment to vision loss. Participants obtain information about local community resources and other services for people who are blind or visually impaired. Designed to increase self-esteem, adjustment to vision loss offers participants the opportunity to discuss feelings and reactions to vision loss; peer support AIDS the adjustment process.vision loss - a family affair: offers advice and direction to family, friends, and caregivers on ways to assist a loved one with adapting successfully to the many changes that accompany vision loss.assistive technology (at): teaches the latest hardware, software and peripherals that aid people who are blind with working around their challenges to access information and create electronic documents. Devices include smartphones, tablets, digital recorders, refreshable braille displays, screen readers, screen magnification software, desktop and portable video magnifiers, large print and tactile keyboards, wearable technology. Braille literacy: teaches individuals a tactile method of reading and writing. Individuals use braille to label household items, take notes, read and write. By using braille, people who are blind can review and study the written word. Most of all, individuals have access to a wide range of reading materials including educational and recreational reading and practical manuals. Through braille, people who are blind can pursue hobbies and cultural enrichment with materials such as music scores, playing cards, bingo cards, board games.independent living skills (ils): teaches people who are blind or visually impaired the techniques used to live independently: meal preparation, money management, self care, cleaning the home.orientation and mobility (o&m): orientation and mobility teaches individuals to familiarize themselves with and travel safely and efficiently through various environments using remaining vision, a long cane and/or optical AIDS. Orientation and mobility enhances movement within home, school, work, and community settings.vocational assessment: vocational assessment services assist people who are blind or visually impaired with identifying strengths, abilities and interests to determine the scope of services necessary to obtain employment.low vision and blindness AIDS: community center for the blind and visually impaired stocks an array of items that foster independence and make life more productive for people who have limited or no vision. Canes, magnifiers, talking timepieces, and braille and large print playing cards are among the products available for purchase.ccbvi received grant funds to provide devices and training services to visually impaired persons between the ages of 18-54 years of age who are not consumers of department of rehabilitation blind field services, who are not employed, and who are not seeking employment. The devices recommended by the instructor and training on how to use the devices are provided at no cost to the individual.ccbvi created a
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 69.5%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -61.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.49; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 69.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $439K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.