Community Center for the Arts

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830314362
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Jackson, WY, USA
Phone
3077348956
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,620,613
Expenses
$4,926,916
Assets
$36,406,236
Liabilities
$2,111,901

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marty Camino (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Marty Camino (Executive Director): $206,576 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To connect our creative community by providing a dedicated campus, supporting excellent programming, and nurturing a collaborative spirit.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Center's mission is to connect the creative community of Jackson Hole by providing a dedicated campus, supporting excellent programming, and nurturing a collaborative spirit. It is the Center's vision to make artistic experience central to Jackson Hole by embracing the values of stewardship, excellence, inclusion, creativity, and respect. In this way, the Center makes the arts accessible to all in the Jackson Hole and surrounding community. To achieve its purposes, the Center hosts other community arts organizations at its main campus and operates arts programs.(Continued on Schedule O)A core part of the Center's mission is to enhance arts and culture in its community. Jackson Hole has developed a robust community of small arts organizations, which were slowly disappearing due to the high cost of rent in the area. From the beginning, part of the purpose of the Center's main campus was to provide space at substantially below-cost for multiple arts organizations to flourish. The Center now has twenty nonprofit arts and education "Resident organizations exempt under Section 501(c)(3 as tenants. In addition to substantially below-cost rent for office space, these organizations receive deeply discounted access to the Center's campus for performances, exhibitions and other displays of their work. In some cases, that access is complimentary, allowing Residents to work closely with each other and form new collaborations using the common spaces, conference centers, and equipment of the Center for free.In addition to Resident Organizations, the Center conducts several creative programs of its own. Currently, the three main ones are: Center Presents, Center Collaborations, and Campus Exhibitions. The Center Presents series brings a diverse selection of national and internationally recognized performers to Jackson Hole, Wyoming. The Center Collaborations program supports outstanding programming on the arts campus based on creative merit, shared audiences, and resources (financial need), and encourages risk-taking artwork. Finally, Campus Exhibitions add visual vibrancy to the Center by supporting and showcasing a diverse group of artists, particularly local artists and artists who might not otherwise be recognized more broadly. The Campus Exhibitions program is pivotal in creating a positive and artistic experience for patrons visiting the Center.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.9%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.39; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.9% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $207K · 24 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.