Community Career Development Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237209115
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
2138054273
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,849,214
Expenses
$6,022,444
Assets
$1,403,104
Liabilities
$1,048,823

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALBERTO R URIBE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-UNTIL 09/2022)
  • RHONDA ROSE (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALBERTO R URIBE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-UNTIL 09/2022): $121,262 total reported compensation
  • RHONDA ROSE (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $106,858 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve adults and disadvantaged and at risk youth, including but not limited to the ages of 14 to 21, to develop and gain the skills to transition them into employment or further their education.

What it reported doing in 2022

County of los angeles our la county-funded program services enable us to expand our service offerings to a broader clientele. Through a variety of la county funded grants, these programs prepare residents of los angeles county to succeed in the labor market by providing a combination of education, training, paid work experience, career counseling, and support services for residents ages 14 to 24, who have the legal right to work in the united states.this year, we were able to assist 900 in various programs for adults, displaced employees, re-entry clients, out-of-school adolescents, underserved students, teenagers on public assistance, foster youth, youth on probation, system-involved youths, individuals experiencing homelessness, and many others.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.9%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.75; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.9% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.