Community Behavioral Health Association of Maryland Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320397450
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Catonsville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4107881865
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $454,498
- Expenses
- $417,597
- Assets
- $178,101
- Liabilities
- $5,461
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHERINE MEYERS (PRESIDENT)
- CARI CHO (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- SHANNON HALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CATHERINE MEYERS (PRESIDENT)
- CARI CHO (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- ROBERT CANOSA (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rehabilitation of persons with disabling mental illnesses through state-of-the-art community support services designed to enhance living skills and self-reliance.
What it reported doing in 2015
As a statewide professional organization of over 54 community-based agencies, cbh is dedicated to making high quality rehabilitation services available. These non-profit agencies serve 160,000 citizens with mental illnesses through state-of-the-art community support services designed to enhance living skills and self-reliance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.5%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.5% of revenue deployed · 68% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $284K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.