Community Asset and Resource Enterprise Partnership

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

7 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Community mobilization for health and well being

Well-being assists individuals and families in accessing resources needed o resolve issues that affect their emotional well-being and safety

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: Limited
Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -14%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: -100.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -84.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -77.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 17.5% of spending went to programs
Governance: 4 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $5K · 7 people listed
Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.