Community Agency for Senior Citizens Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133263537
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Staten Island, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7189816226
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,437,772
- Expenses
- $7,183,771
- Assets
- $4,755,960
- Liabilities
- $2,303,867
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALBANA TELIC (PRESIDENT/CE)
Highest reported compensation
- ALBANA TELIC (PRESIDENT/CE): $185,435 total reported compensation
- VERONIKA ANGELIDIS (DIR OF PROGR): $138,966 total reported compensation
- SUSAN LEWIS FORMER (CFO/ASST SEC): $121,354 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes for which community agency for senior citizens (casc) was formed are: (a) to aid and counsel the members of the senior citizen community, as well as others in the city of New York, and particularly in the staten island area thereof, through consumer information programs, social and health services programs, and coordinated social and recreational programs; (b) to coordinate the activities and services available to the senior citizens community of the city of New York, and more particularly of staten island, by acting as a forum and information center for charitable, educational and social welfare service programs serving that community, and to this end to act in a liaison capacity with respect to all agencies, both private and governmental, carrying on such service programs; (c) to engage in public information programs with respect to the senior citizens community of the city of New York, and more particularly of staten island, and, in connection therewith, to support legi
What it reported doing in 2024
Nyc department for the aging title iiib: providing comprehensive, community social services to older adults, age 60 years and older, in the forms of case assistance, including information and assistance with entitlements and benefits applications; case management for home-bound older adults, including those receiving home delivered meals and nys eisep home care; elder abuse prevention and intervention services for victims of elder abuse, including safety planning, education, counseling, advocacy, court accompaniment, lock replacement as well as community education; transportation for food shopping, to/from senior centers, recreational trips and limited medical appointments; 2 neighborhood senior centers, providing 2 hot meals daily, socialization, case assistance, educational, recreational, arts and culture and wellness programs; ny connects, providing information and referral for long term care services and support needs for people of all ages with disabilities and their caregivers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.5%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $65.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.5% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $185K · 17 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.