Community Action Partnership of Oregon

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300180905
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Salem, OR, USA
Phone
5037897451
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Interdisciplinary Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,480,502
Expenses
$5,355,514
Assets
$1,954,025
Liabilities
$1,451,099

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEMP SHUEY (PRESIDENT)
  • CONNIE GUENTERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAN BROWN (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JANET ALLANACH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JANET ALLANACH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $117,907 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To magnify the impact of community action to serve low-income oregonians by advocating for resources with a unified voice, strengthening partnerships, and building capacity.

What it reported doing in 2024

For fy2025 the balance of state continuum of care travelled through the 26 county geographic area and facilitated community wide meetings, worked in collaboration with state agencies to continue administering state shelter funding, acted as the lead agency for the coc pit count both in conducting the 2025 count and planning and training for the 2026 count, managed hmis data for all coc agencies, submitted agency support letters for state and federal grants, continued work on the coordinated entry system, administered rapid rehousing and permanent supportive housing standards to all bos agencies, monitored hud grant report submission, coordinated youth and domestic violence work groups, conducted a coc wide training conference with over 170 participants, expanded the training library, participated in the governor's emergency shelter system work group, managed and expanded the bos community hub, provided testimony on local and state level legislative and zoning concerns, held monthly governing board meetings including the in-person annual meeting, completed the 5 year strategic plan, and presented at multiple housing summits across the state. The hmis program successfully added and trained 204 new servicepoint users while consistently supporting an average of 315 users throughout the year. We provided comprehensive data quality support for agencies, encompassing 31,056 client entries for housing assistance, shelter, or outreach services. Additionally, our staff completed the annual system performance measures reports, longitudinal systems analysis, and pit and hic data on time and as required.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.8% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 23 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.