Community Access Network Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475194456
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Lynchburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 4348187880
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,560,075
- Expenses
- $13,287,348
- Assets
- $4,215,731
- Liabilities
- $1,581,749
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINA DELZINGARO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL JUDD (CMO): $397,484 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER STIRGWOLT (MD): $271,077 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINA DELZINGARO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $184,023 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of community access network is to ensure exceptional, quality, compassionate, and comprehensive healthcare for every member of our community.we fulfill this mission by directly providing healthcare and health-related social services, as well as by creating a network of healthcare providers and organizations that prioritize health and compassion. We work together to break down the barriers that keep our neighbors from receiving the best individualized care.
What it reported doing in 2025
Ryan white: the community access network cares program, primarily funded by hrsa and vdh, provides a comprehensive system of HIV primary medical care, essential support services, case management, and medications for low-income people living with HIV who are uninsured or underserved.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $51.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $397K · 25 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.