Communities of Rooted Brilliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271458930
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2067698181
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,340,973
Expenses
$2,163,490
Assets
$1,972,740
Liabilities
$145,559

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSHUA BANKS (PRESIDENT)
  • GLORIA GRIMM (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MONA T HAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MONA T HAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $129,596 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Embracing traditional customs and values, communities of rooted brilliance (crb) provides newcomers with community-inspired educational opportunities that create pathways for self-determination as they weave into the fabric of their newfound home.

What it reported doing in 2025

Gifts laughter opportunities wisdom (glow): the glow program is tailored for multilingual caregivers, a community-driven initiative to foster connections and promote self-sufficiency, empowering families to draw upon their own experiences and learn collectively. This program is a healing space where individuals can share their stories, support one another, and navigate the challenges faced by newcomers.kyp-ela/bsk - experiential learning academy (ela): the ela program is an out-of-school time enrichment program that aims to close the opportunity gap for newcomer refugee youth by building their soft skills and leadership skills. Ela combines peer-to-peer mentoring and targeted academic enrichment opportunities in a supportive out-of-school time and space for newly arrived refugee and immigrant youth.promoting refugee integration, mobility, & empowerment (prime): the prime program offers individualized case management for refugees with significant cultural barriers or those who are struggling with academic performance.youth voices program (yv/riyac): the youth voices program is designed to build and strengthen community capacity and youth leadership through a series of trainings, community focus groups/discussions, and a culminating youth-led events. The youth participate in the refugee and immigrant youth advisory council (riyac) to connect community members with government and stakeholders such as school districts, city, county, and state representatives for policy and system change to promote thriving communities.kent community development collaborative (kcdc): the kcdc program is a partnership of kent-based community-based organizations to address place-based health inequities for communities living in the city of kent.the parent and children together (pact): the pact bsk - the pact program centers on culturally appropriate universal developmental screening conversations led by parent leaders of children 0-5 years of age from newcomer refugee/immigrant communities. Parent leaders plan and execute customized learning opportunities on culturally situated topics related to child development, leveraging their strong interpersonal relationships and community connections. Birch creek-reading/bsk, ksd-reading/bsk, ksd-reading/rsip and sps-reading: the education programs target elementary school aged youth in stem, reading and language arts, so that they are reading at standard levels and excelling academically. The reading programs target elementary school aged youth from the seattle public schools for the summer so that they are reading at standard levels.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $165.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.