Communidades Latinas Unidas En Servico Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411386986
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6513794200
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Vocational Counseling

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,787,583
Expenses
$14,182,142
Assets
$16,889,802
Liabilities
$5,266,667

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANA RUBI LEE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANA RUBI LEE (PRESIDENT): $346,358 total reported compensation
  • SANTIAGO DE ANGELO (COO (THRU DEC. 24')): $230,988 total reported compensation
  • RYAN ROBINSON (VP FINANCE & ADMIN): $153,201 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Clues advances social and economuc equity and wellbeing for latinos by building upon our strengths and cultures, uplifting our community, and activating leadership for systemic change.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community health services (chs) focus on addressing health disparities affecting latino community members not only in themetropolitan area of minneapolis, st paul, and in some rural areas in southern Minnesota. Clues has a strong background working with the latino community around chronic disease prevention, policy, and systems and environmental (pse) change. Clues has led a strong coalition of latino leaders, local churches, community groups, cbo's, colleges, and local institutions committed to implement local pse changes among latino communities. Through the utilization of community health navigators, chs offers early interventions through education & access and promotes healthy behaviors among latino communities, families, and individuals. Community health workers disseminate health promotion and prevention education around tobacco cessation, exposure to secondhand smoke, diabetes prevention, drugs and alcohol, chronic disease self-management through the "tomando control de su salud" (taking control of your health) workshop model, healthy eating, active living, and sex education through a teen pregnancy prevention program. Specific interventions within community health services range from community engagement at large cultural, ethnic, religious events to one-on-one direct services through home visit education, tobacco cessation, and health care access. The chs department expanded its canasta familiar/ food popup program to allow east and west metro residents access to healthy and cultural food. Clues is currently serving approximately over 600 families weekly.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $346K · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $438K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.