Communications Workers of America Local 1014

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
226082849
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Pennsauken, NJ, USA
Phone
8568121064
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,270,698
Expenses
$919,982
Assets
$1,815,989
Liabilities
$83,900

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BELLAMY JOHNSON BARBARA (CITY CAMDEN SUPERVISORY PRESIDENT)
  • STOUT DAVID (CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERVISORY PRESIDENT)
  • EVANS JOHNSON SACHINA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • STEINER GARREN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEINER GARREN (PRESIDENT): $87,308 total reported compensation
  • RAY TATANYA (TREASURER): $12,500 total reported compensation
  • EVANS JOHNSON SACHINA (VICE PRESIDENT): $7,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cwa local 1014 is part of the communications workers of america. The cwa represents 700,000 workers in private and public sector employment in the united states, canada and puerto rico. The cwa is composed of 1,200 chartered cwa local unions in 10,000 communities across the united states. Cwa members w0rk in telecommunication and information technology, the airline industry, news media, broadcast and cable television, education, health care and public service, law enforcement, manufacturing and other fields.

What it reported doing in 2023

Cwa local 1014 is part of the communications workers of america. The cwa represents 700,000 workers in private and public sector employment in the united states, canada, and puerto rico in 1,200 chartered cwa local unions. In the 10,000 communities across the united states, cwa members work in telecommunications and information technology, the airline industry, news media, broadcast and cable television, education, health care and public service, law enforcement, manufacturing, and other fields.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, 0% for grants, and 45% for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.7%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.97; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.7% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 26 of 26 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $830K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 28 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.