Communication Workers of America Local 9511

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
952101814
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Escondido, CA, USA
Phone
7607434554
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,887
Expenses
$175,529
Assets
$73,847
Liabilities
$9,756

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ARTURO GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ARTURO GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • ADAM WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JESSE ABRIL (SECRETARY-TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The local is engaged in the implementation of the objectives of the communications workers of america to represent employees in matters related to employment conditions and employer-employee relations, including, but not limited to, wages, hours, and other terms and contions of employment, and to protect and preserve the union as an institution in the performance of its legal and contractual obligations.

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote solidarity within its membership; establish and maintain positive relationships with employers; strengthen bonds and alliances within the labor movement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.4%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 47.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.