Communication Workers of America Local 84775
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 310708079
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $777,558
- Expenses
- $735,762
- Assets
- $1,192,028
- Liabilities
- $5,082
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAWN SMITH (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- SAMUEL SANDERS (PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS WILSON (FORMER PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DAWN SMITH (VICE-PRESIDENT): $67,848 total reported compensation
- CARLA CLAY (SEC-TREASURER): $64,486 total reported compensation
- SAMUEL SANDERS (PRESIDENT): $55,984 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Labor union
What it reported doing in 2023
Member relief fund
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.5%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 52%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 76.5%; rating input score 76; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 32.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.5% of revenue deployed · 52% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 17 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $382K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.