Commonwealth Fund for Ket Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611285473
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lexington, KY, USA
Phone
8592587000
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,023,691
Expenses
$8,199,631
Assets
$50,211,658
Liabilities
$690,859

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHAE HOPKINS (EXEC DIRECTOR/CEO)
  • MICHELE RIPLEY (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SHAE HOPKINS (EXEC DIRECTOR/CEO): $472,086 total reported compensation
  • MICHELE RIPLEY (PRESIDENT): $181,828 total reported compensation
  • DAN GRIFFITH (DIRECTOR (AUTHORITY)): $650 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to support and further the educational, charitable and public purposes and activities of the Kentucky authority for educational television (authority) and the related Kentucky educational television foundation, inc. (foundation). The fund's primary purpose is to receive, hold and administer funds provided by its fundraising activities, which are concentrated primarily in the state of Kentucky, for the benefit of the authority and the foundation.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization's purpose is to support the mission of the authority for Kentucky educational television, the governing body of Kentucky educational television (ket). As one of the nation's largest public television networks, ket is used by more than 2 million people each week and its educational resources are utilized in every Kentucky school district as well as classrooms across the nation. Accessible through broadcast, mobile and connected devices, ket's content includes originally produced Kentucky history, culture and public affairs programs in addition to the national pbs lineup. Serving the educational needs of the state, ket delivers the most-trusted children's educational programming plus cradle-to-career instructional services including early childhood teaching tools and certification, k-12 digital learning resources and professional training for educators, and ged and workforce development prep. The website www.ket.org/making-a-difference-archives tells the story of the teachers, students, families and communities impacted by ket's programs and services.the prior-year spike in revenue was due to two extraordinary bequests and a one-time fundraising campaign to construct and equip a new louisville production center, which opened in january 2025. Unrestricted annual giving continued to increase year-over-year. Quarter 4 saw significant growth in fundraising as many donors responded to the threat of federal funding cuts. An additional $1.349 million in federal funding that matched private funds was raised.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.7%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 66%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.6%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.12; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.7% of revenue deployed · 66% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $472K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $379K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.