Virginia Mason Franciscan Health
Legal name: Commonspirit Washington F/k/a Franciscan Health System
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910564491
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 2536804005
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,991,111,655
- Expenses
- $2,001,669,215
- Assets
- $1,147,131,491
- Liabilities
- $945,965,682
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
40 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KETUL PATEL (CEO VMFH & PRESIDENT NORTHWEST REGION)
- JAMES TERWILLIGER (PRESIDENT, PUGET SOUND MARKET (THRU 02/25))
- MATTHEW METSKER PA-C MPAS MHA CMPE (PRESIDENT ST CLARE HOSPITAL)
- DINO JOHNSON (PRESIDENT ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL)
- DEEPAK DEVASTHALI (PRESIDENT ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER)
- JENNIFER SCHOMBURG (PRESIDENT ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER (THRU 7/24))
Highest reported compensation
- KETUL PATEL (CEO VMFH & PRESIDENT NORTHWEST REGION): $5,754,859 total reported compensation
- CHARLEEN TACHIBANA RN (REGION CHIEF QUALITY-SAFETY-PATIENT EXP OFFICER-NW): $1,611,248 total reported compensation
- JAMES TERWILLIGER (PRESIDENT, PUGET SOUND MARKET (THRU 02/25)): $1,486,521 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Here whenever you need us. Find a clinic Virtual urgent care Virtual urgent care is a supplement for in-person care and provides an appointment via video chat from 6 a.m. to midnight with board-certified providers. Virginia Mason Francsican Health virtual urgent care provides consultation, diagnosis and treatment, including prescriptions, as appropriate, all from the comfort of home - or on the go. In many cases, virtual urgent care can be there when the flu strikes late, a nasty cough develops during an important meeting, or a camping trip is interrupted by a spider bite.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule h
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.8M · 40 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $169.4M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 53 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 366 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.