Common Goal USA Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300588283
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6106085546
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Soccer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $754,755
- Expenses
- $968,713
- Assets
- $198,999
- Liabilities
- $52,434
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VLADIMIR BORKOVIC (PRESIDENT)
- LILLIAN BARRETT-O'KEEFE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & VP (THRU JULY))
- MARY CONNOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG SEPT))
Highest reported compensation
- LILLIAN BARRETT-O'KEEFE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & VP (THRU JULY)): $74,150 total reported compensation
- MARY CONNOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG SEPT)): $43,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The promotion of youth welfare and international development cooperation, in particular with soccer being used as a medium for social integration, violence prevention, improvement of medical care and extracurricular education.
What it reported doing in 2024
Common goal USA is dedicated to using soccer to create safe and inclusive communities across north america. We enable a network of youth-focused organizations to maximize soccer's impact for youth and communities. We focus on supporting coaches and organizations to advance gender equity, social inclusion, education, and health for young people in disadvantaged areas across the region. In 2024, common goal delivered hundreds of hours of training and capacity-building support for soccer leaders.create the space: in january 2024, common goal USA launched a national mental health initiative called create the space. Over the course of the year, create the space logged 54 hours of immersive training with 45 leaders from across the soccer ecosystem, as well as four virtual trainings and a youth mental health in-person series during copa america, reaching hundreds of youth across three states. The capstone event was the in-person retreat, which garnered near-perfect satisfaction ratings.play proud is a common-goal led, lgbtq+ inclusion program that aims to create a soccer community that actively celebrates diversity and fosters inclusion for lgbtq+ communities. By engaging professional soccer clubs, supporters groups, and soccer for good organizations, the program builds capacities and implements actionable steps to create safer spaces for lgbtq+ communities in soccer. Through tailored in-person training, collaborative action plans, and community-driven initiatives, play proud works to create sustainable change across soccer ecosystems. In 2024, play proud implemented the year-long lgbtq+ inclusion program through 2 in-person residencies hosted by soccer in the streets and real salt lake/Utah royals, online workshops, and actionable-specific inclusion plans for each city group. The cohort was made up of 29 participants from 9 professional soccer clubs, 7 soccer for good organizations, and 3 supporters groups. Switch the pitch is a nationwide initiative focused on inclusive coaching and racial justice within and through soccer. During the year, common goal and partners delivered coach and organizational training in three states, reaching over 200 coaches, educators, and program leaders with interactive and experiential content designed to create inclusive spaces for all people to thrive within and through soccer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $42.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.9%; rating input score 96; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $874K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.