Campep
Legal name: Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541748225
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, US
- Phone
- 571-298-1239
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $486,897
- Expenses
- $336,030
- Assets
- $2,127,102
- Liabilities
- $6,887
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL MCNITT-GRAY (PRESIDENT & CHAIR)
- ROBERT J PIZZUTIELLO JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GEORGE STARKSCHALL (EXECUTIVE SECRETARY): $77,563 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mission of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs (CAMPEP) is to promote consistent quality education of medical physicists by evaluating and accrediting Graduate, Residency, Professional Doctorate in Medical Physics (DMP), Certificate, and Continuing Education programs that meet high standards established by CAMPEP in collaboration with its sponsoring organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Graduate programs: 2 new graduate programs were accredited in 2024, bringing the total graduate program remains to 54 ms, 44 phd, 31 certificate, and 4 dmp programs in 2024. Certification in the field is based upon achieving an advanced degree in the field from a campep accredited program to ensure that appropriate training and experience have occurred and that the individual has had the essential educational and continuing education: medical physics certification demands an ongoing experience requirements needed to engage in medical physics. Strict standards and significant peer review are required to achieve accreditation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.33; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 15 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $116K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.