Comm Foundation of Carroll County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201413585
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Carroll, IA, USA
Phone
7127923508
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$474,984
Expenses
$425,730
Assets
$1,928,193
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stacey Tonniges (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Stacey Tonniges (President & CEO)
  • Brian Johnson (Director)
  • Charles Nixon (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Organization's purpose is to administer various charitable funds, including funds received from the State of Iowa to be used for the benefit of the citizens of Carroll and Sac counties. The Organization administers and grows various 501(c)(3) endowment funds, including those endowment funds created for each county under state statute, for the benefit of Iowa citizens.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Organization directly administers multiple funds, including ninr endowment funds, according to the federal and state requirements, and the National Standards for Community Foundations. The majority of the direct support for the Organization is received from the State of Iowa, currently for the benefit of Carroll County and Sac County. Of those funds, 25% are required to be placed in permanent endowments for the benefit of the citizens of Carroll County and Sac County. The remaining funds from the State are to be used for the public benefit of each county to enhance the cultural, educational, and recreational opportunities, as well as for the public health and safety of local communities and other community opportunities. The Organization will only provide grants to qualified projects meeting the charitable objectives to benefit community citizens and to governmental organizations or those recognized as eligible charitable organizations under 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) or those similarly qualified. Similarly, the Organization administers its other funds to meet their stated functions, under the Organization's governing criteria.During the current year the Organization awarded 40 grants for the following types of projects: flooring replacement for American legion, shelter house improvements, toys for a daycare, security cameras for a daycare, lighting and fencing for baseball field, kayaks & trailers for conservation board, sending kids with cancer to summer camp, community sign, tanker truck for fire department, industrial fans for county fair, infant room, facility improvements, cooler and compressor, smart tv and computer for senior center, church restoration and repair, break area for staff of mental health center, handicapped accessible bus, trail resurfacing, nature play addition, playground expansion, facility for wrestling club, improvements for rec center, contribution to community center, and entrace sign for local community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.53; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $404K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 26 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 26 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.