Coming Together Virginia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834462226
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8048742709
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Intergroup, Race Relations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $159,502
- Expenses
- $86,578
- Assets
- $218,169
- Liabilities
- $8,429
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Danita Green (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Tina Slaughter (Chair)
- Rev Amy Starr Redwine (Secretary)
- George Jennison (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To open hearts and minds through shared learning and bold truth-telling. To Connect People across the racial divide to teach and model dialogue processes for difficult conversations on racial experience to promote action to dismantle the legacy of enslavement to call forth just and equitable communities in Virginia and beyond. Creating opportunities for relationships to develop across racial lines through learning history, sharing stories and working together in the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
See Schedule O for description of program service accomplishments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35.9%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 65.9%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 102.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 35.9% of revenue deployed · 65.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.