Comfort Homesake
Legal name: Comfort Homesake Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562471878
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Palmdale, CA, US
- Phone
- +1 213-887-1152
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospices
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,946
- Expenses
- $57,096
- Assets
- $141,729
- Liabilities
- $43,548
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nandi Davis (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Marilyn Ababio (Managing Director)
- Kimberly Habi (Secretary)
- Nandi Davis (Executive Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide culturally responsive care and meaningful support for individuals, families, and caregivers navigating serious illness and aging.
What it reported doing in 2025
Question 31: Other services. Comfort Homesake participates with physicians and clinical practioners as part of bio-ethnics committees for the Alameda Health System in Alameda Co. CA and at UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica. In addition these committees request participation in Interdisciplinary Team meetings to vote on patient care for unrepresented or incapcitated patients. This time committment time reading case studies time deliberating is estimated annually
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.5%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.6%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.48; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 54.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $58K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.