Combat Female Veterans Families United
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822065754
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Greensboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9196377679
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $90,585
- Expenses
- $176,127
- Assets
- $45,944
- Liabilities
- $43,097
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michelle Turner (President)
- Robin Hamilton (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jacqueline Stanley (Director)
- Christine Youngquist (Director)
- Clara Driscoll (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Combat Female Veterans Families United enhances the personal and economic wellbeing of women veterans and their families by having a family driven, parenting concerned organization to encourage their cycle of reintegration, independence, safety, happiness, success for their homes, secondary education, jobs and communities. Our programs provide: transition assistance, economic/emergency financial assistance, advocacy support and development, resource referrals and vital supplies to women veterans and their families. Financial assistance includes mortgage/rent, utilities, repairs, food and other basic needs costs. Transition services includes care packages, support groups and mentoring.
What it reported doing in 2023
Support for female veterans and their families
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -94.4%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.94; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 86.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 63.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $162K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.