Comal County Conservation Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830784635
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Canyon Lake, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2102410317
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,802
- Expenses
- $160,848
- Assets
- $186,328
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Roxanna Deane (President)
- Heather Harrison (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Roxanna Deane (President)
- Marisa Bruno (DIRECTOR @LARGE)
- KIM HANNAN (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Comal conservation's purpose is to educate, engage, and encourage our community to join the effort to preserve land, water, and wildlife in comal county.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educate landowners about conservation easements to conserve privately held land from future development; assist with the conservation process and act as a resource for landowners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 29.8%; rating input score 30
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37% of revenue deployed · 29.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.