Columbus Soccer Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830959162
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Columbus, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6623867392
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,177
- Expenses
- $134,706
- Assets
- $113,034
- Liabilities
- $81,273
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA TACKETT (VICE PRESIDENT - COMPETITIVE)
- RICHARD LILE (VICE PRESIDENT - RECREATIONAL)
- AMBER BRISLIN (VICE PRESIDENT - PUBLIC OU)
- JIMMY PARKER (PRESIDENT / ADULT SOCCER)
People named in this filing
- THOMAS VELEK (DIRECTOR OF COACHING)
- JESSICA TACKETT (VICE PRESIDENT - COMPETITIVE)
- RICHARD LILE (VICE PRESIDENT - RECREATIONAL)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide an environment in which all players can improve and develop a love for soccer. Our mission is to get children playing the game of soccer in a safe environment whre we lay out the proper foundations for growth in the sport despite the level being played.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide recreation and competitive soccer environment and opportunities for more than 500 players, 50 coaches and referees within the lowndes county and surrounding areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.