Columbine Baseball Boosters

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822965779
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Littleton, CO, USA
Phone
3035514299
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,240
Expenses
$416,597
Assets
$48,553
Liabilities
$125,444

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Amy Richie (PRESIDENT)
  • Becca Isaacson (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • Matt Lopez (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • Amy Richie (PRESIDENT)
  • Becca Isaacson (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • Matt Lopez (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a charitable organization the provides cash flow management for a high school baseball team. We gather and distribute funds for winter baseball workouts, uniforms and travel expenses. We also fundraise money to support the team. Purchases include baseballs. uniforms, training aids, general coaching equipment and maintenance of items not covered by the school.

What it reported doing in 2025

WE PROVIDED COLLECTIONS AND DISTRIBUTION FOR WINTER WORKOUTS AND TRAVEL BASEBALL. WE ALSO PROVIDE WORKOUT UNIFORMS, GAME UNIFORMS, BASEBALLS, UMPIRES, FIELD MAINTENANCE, ETC. Beginning on 8/1/2025 we initiated a field improvement and turfed the email. This was funded from fundraising the past four years and the remainder is being financed with a bank loan.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -197.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.58; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -38.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -32% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.