Columbian Home of Boulder

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

4 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

To manage and operate the building for the knights of columbus boulder council 1183.

Revenue model: No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.