Columbia Social Club of Rockland Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042673219
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Rockland, MA, USA
Phone
7818712407
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,257
Expenses
$62,338
Assets
$235,131
Liabilities
$4,507

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William Hamilton (President)

People named in this filing

  • William Hamilton (President)
  • George Fopiano (Secretary)
  • Ron Davenport (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Columbia Social Club is operated for and by the members, Knights of Columbus. The club serves as a social gathering place that promotes recreation, social networking and charitable project planning and execution.

What it reported doing in 2020

Contributions to charitable organizations including, Rockland Knight of Columbus, Champions Fighting Cancer, District 12 VFW, Fraternal Order of Eagles, Massachusetts State Knights of Columbus, Massachusetts Vigil Society, Play area for Rockland Kids, Relay for Life, Rockland Aerie, Rockland Athletic Club, Rockland Basketball, Rockland Friends, Rockland Holiday Magic, Rockland Lions Club, Rockland Little League, Rockland Memorial Library, Rockland Senior Men's Club, South Shore Vocational Technical High School, St. Vincent DePaul, Toys for Tots and Tri-Town Scholarship Awards.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -93.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.77; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.