Columbia River Crossing Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263889540
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032248684
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $8,630
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- SANDRA MCDONOUGH (DIRECTOR)
- TODD COLEMAN (DIRECTOR)
- PAUL MONTAGUE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build public consensus and support of a cohesive plan/design for the building of the new bridge across the columbia river ("columbia river crossing").
What it reported doing in 2014
Worked to build public and legislative support for a new bridge across the columbia river (the crossing) through public relations efforts:1) engaged a public relations firm to help secure public support and illustrate that support to federal and state legislators. Efforts included visiting with reporters and editorial boards, writing op-eds and speaking to the public.2) continued developing a list of potential supporters whose names may be used as evidence of suppport of the crossing in order to develop even more widespread support from legislators and the public.3) continued to maintain a website to educate and inform supporters and the public about the coalition and the crossing project. 4) continued publishing a newsletter to provide information and education to supporters and potential supporters of the crossing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -28.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.