Columbia Land Trust

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943140861
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Vancouver, WA, USA
Phone
3606960131
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Land Resources Conservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,793,237
Expenses
$10,033,347
Assets
$150,160,506
Liabilities
$4,814,685

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA AMATO (PRESIDENT)
  • MEGAN RUTLEDGE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MEGAN RUTLEDGE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $218,982 total reported compensation
  • STEPHEN COOK (GENERAL COUNSEL): $166,861 total reported compensation
  • AMY COSTELLO (CHIEF OF STAFF): $143,802 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The columbia land trust conserves signature landscapes and vital habitat together with the landowners and communities of the columbia river region.

What it reported doing in 2024

Land stewardship: protecting and enhancing the conservation values of conserved lands is some of the most important work for columbia land trust. It is the responsibility of the stewardship program to protect conservation values and to be a good neighbor and community member for all columbia land trust properties through science-based management. The land trust evaluates each property for its conservation value, the threats to these values, and for opportunities to enhance conservation through responsible management. A stewardship plan is developed and implemented based on this analysis to include annual monitoring as part of an adaptive management framework.continued on schedule othe stewardship program is responsible for over 38,900 acres of land. The land trust are active in resource management, striving to improve habitat function and values on all of its properties. Restoration actions are implemented including improving hydrologic connectivity, habitat diversity and composition, and reducing risks such as wildfire. In recent years, this has included removing levees, planting tens of thousands of trees and shrubs, controlling invasive species, and thinning forests to improve stand structure and reduce fire fuel loads (including with the use of prescribed fire). A number of columbia land trust properties currently include significant restoration work to replace lost functions and increase the conservation value of the property. A stewardship funding strategy, including gift donations during the acquisition process, is an integral part of every new conservation project. The fund is used to provide for future expenses of land management, monitoring, enforcing compliance with easement restrictions, and underwriting legal defense of the conservation protections for all columbia land trust properties. Columbia land trust has also established a stewardship endowment to provide permanent support for program activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.7%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.97; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.7% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $219K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.