Columbia-brazoria Ffa Alumni and Supporters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 472987865
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- West Columbia, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8304561912
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,877
- Expenses
- $24,998
- Assets
- $49,614
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LEAH SHACKELFORD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LEAH SHACKELFORD (PRESIDENT)
- ROXANNA REED (VICE PRESIDE)
- CORRIE BOWEN (SOCIAL OFFIC)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The objective of this chapter shall be to support and promote the columbia-brazoria ffa, ffa activities, and agricultural education on local, state, and national levels, to provide engagement opportunities to former ffa members and supporters of ffa and agricultural education, to promote greater knowledge of this agricultural industry and support education in agriculture, to cooperate with the local ffa chapter, and ffa at the state and national level; to promote and maintain an appreciation of the american free enterprise system, and to promote the personal develoment aspect of ffa.
What it reported doing in 2024
To support and promote the columbia-brazoria ffa, ffa activities, and agricultural eduction on local, state, and national levels
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.3%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 74.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 52.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.3% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.