The Colt Anderson Dream Big Foundation
Legal name: Colt Anderson Skills Camp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821271763
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Butte, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4064982306
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,360
- Expenses
- $96,981
- Assets
- $193,051
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Colt Anderson (President)
- Keelie Anderson (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Colt Anderson (President)
- Keelie Anderson (Vice President)
- Ross Richardson (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Colt Anderson Dream Big Foundation is a qualified 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to creating positive change for our children by providing resources, innovative opportunities, and experiences that will empower them to find their passion to dream big and succeed.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization hosts a series of events over a 2-day period. Those events include a skills camp, a speaking engagement, a community concert along with an fmx show, as well as a free kids day full of activities and experiences. These events are organized with the idea of providing resources and experiences that encourage kids to work hard and to dream big. There are special celebrity guests at each event that help create excitement and motivation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 96.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $97K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.