Colquitt County Packer Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272594065
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Moultrie, GA, USA
- Phone
- 2299851213
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $946,087
- Expenses
- $891,356
- Assets
- $618,141
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- DAVID TYNDALL (Trustee)
- MARK MOBLEY (Trustee)
- JIMMY JETER (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In recognition of the need to promote the overall achievement levels of young people, the colquitt county packer foundation inc. Is formed to promote the advancement of the programs of the colquitt county public school system (the "system") by providing financial and volunteer support to the students, principals, teachers, and coaches of the system in the development of interscholastic student programs, by providing tax-exempt status to various activity specific support clubs ("clubs"), by raising funds to supplement club efforts, by providing governance and accounting oversight, by facilitating consistent communications, and by leveraging volunteer efforts.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Colquitt County Packer Foundation Inc. was formed in support of school activities. Football, mens basketball, womens basketball and softball, baseball, tennis, soccer, golf, wrestling, cheerleading, fishing, choir, women's flag football, cross country, and volleyball have clubs specifically designed to support their individual sports. In 2025, these clubs collectively raised approximately $1,175,000 in revenue and spent over $885,000 for program service expenses which included uniforms, equipment and supplies, meals and nutrition supplements, game travel, camps, and awards for athletes in middle school, junior high and high school level sports. The clubs also spent over $94,000 directly related to fundraising efforts for direct support of the clubs. Finally, club volunteers were organized to provide hundreds of man hours of service in support of the various sports programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $886K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.