Colorado School Medicaid Consortium
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742854038
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3032178460
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,356,296
- Expenses
- $1,246,526
- Assets
- $3,111,560
- Liabilities
- $458,296
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACEY MOODY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KAROLYN TREGEMBO (EXECUTIVE DI): $141,958 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide streamlined medicaid claiming services to over 60 Colorado school districts and assist those school districts with improving health services for their students.
What it reported doing in 2024
The consortium provides comprehensive programming and services focused on administering the medicaid school health services (shs) program; supporting over 60 school districts and boards of cooperative educational services (boces) across Colorado in their efforts to maximize resources and provide students with increased and equitable access to health services. Addressing the unmet health needs of over 737,550 Colorado students by providing training and consultation for shs providers and administrators; assistance with navigating shs program requirements; and informing the expansion of health services in schools, including: systems change, student health advocacy, insurance outreach and enrollment programs, local service plan development, materials, communications, workshops and quarterly meetings for school district program administrators. The organization also provides streamlined medicaid claiming services: web-based software applications, templates, training and technical support for documentation; data entry; claims processing/submissions, quality assurance; data analysis and reporting. Major accomplishments during the 2024/2025 school year include: training over 11,991 health service providers and administrators; materials, training and support for increased medicaid provider registration requirements; improved digital accessibility for web-based platforms; new self-led trainings, videos, guides, and online tools; advocacy for the medicaid shs program resulting in a 6% statewide increase in reimbursements over the prior year; and targeted support to address the specific needs of rural and urban school districts. For the fiscal year ending june 30, 2025, the consortium processed over 6.850 million health services; provided over 8,807 hours of training; and responded to over 4,036 telephone/email support requests from school-based health providers, school medicaid coordinators, administrators, and community health providers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.8%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.8% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $142K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.