Colorado Rural Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841192031
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Centennial, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038327493
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,986,451
- Expenses
- $4,041,288
- Assets
- $3,798,495
- Liabilities
- $508,436
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE MILLS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE MILLS (CEO): $434,962 total reported compensation
- LORI ARBUCKLE (DIR OF FINANCE): $209,425 total reported compensation
- SARA LEAHY (DIR OF MEMBER SERV): $171,765 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance healthcare services in the state by providing information, education, linkages, tools and energy towards addressing rural health issues.
What it reported doing in 2025
ADVOCACY: The 2025 Colorado legislative session convened on January 14, 2025, and ended 120 days later. This session was marked by a significant state budget shortfall, pushback to proposals from the federal Administration, and a historical battle between Colorado hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry. Of the 657 bills introduced, 476 bills (72%) passed, and Governor Polis vetoed 11 bills. The Colorado Rural Health Center (CRHC) tracked 93 bills and took positions on 25 bills with 93% of the bills CRHC supported passing. The Policy and Legislative Committee is a board lead committee with CRHC Director of Policy and Advocacy providing support for this committee including tracking bills pertinent to rural communities in Colorado. CRHC bill positions are decided by majority vote of the CRHC Policy and Legislative Committee (PLC) and approved by the CRHC Board of Directors. CRHC uses a bill tracker which contains links to Colorado Capitol Watch, where you can find the most recent bill text, fiscal note, bill history and bill sponsors. CRHC regularly publishes policy information in the monthly Special Delivery to inform members, partners and collaborators on policy related information. CRHC tracked 93 bills this session, voting to take positions on twenty-five bills, each corresponding to a CRHC policy priority. CRHC supported fourteen bills (56% of the positions taken), opposed four bills (16% of the positions taken) monitored six bills (24% of the positions taken) and an amend position on one bill (.04% of positions taken). All the bills with a CRHC position correlated with the 2025 Policy Priorities: Facility Reimbursement, Healthcare Workforce, Healthcare Access, Administrative and Regulatory Burdens, and Rural Health Investments and Sustainability.Throughout the session, CRHC testified ten times in committee hearings and coordinated numerous member testimonies, hosted 12 member-driven PLC meetings, secured numerous bill amendments, and made over 200 state policymaker touchpoints to achieve our policy goals. A summary of the 2025 bills, and their rural impact, are outlined in the final report which is available on CRHCs website.2025 was unique in the amount of effort that CRHC put into federal policy. With the Administration taking over in January 2025, we have seen an unprecedented number of Executive Orders impacting healthcare, public health and the standard operations of the federal government. These Executive Orders initially frozen federal funding impacting CRHCs ability to pull down funding of awarded grants and grants were zeroed out leaving an uncertainty of federal funding. Due to these changes CRHC made additional connections at the state and federal levels including to the CO General Assembly, Governor and HCPF.With CRHCs CEO serving as the Chair of the National Rural Health Association, this has afforded CRHC the opportunity to raise the rural voice for Colorado as well as all rural communities nationally. These meetings included Federal Democrat Delegation, HHS Secretary Kennedy and CMS Administrator Dr. Oz. Additionally, CRHC conducted many posts on social media, created a dedicated page on the CRHC website, and participated in many interviews.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 76.3%; rating input score 76; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $435K · 13 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $218K reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 27 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.